Somatic dialogue as a mechanism of neurophysiological regulation

Main Article Content

Yuliia Chukh

Abstract

Somatic dialogue is proposed as an integrative mechanism of neurophysiological regulation, defined as the dynamic interaction between internal verbal processing and interoceptive bodily awareness. Based on recent concepts of embodied cognition, interoception, and autonomic regulation, the paper suggests that the coupling between inner speech and bodily sensation constitutes a functional mechanism for modifying automatic physiological and behavioral responses. Synthesizing the existing literature on inner speech, interoceptive processing, and autonomic regulation, the analysis constructs a conceptual model in which somatic dialogue operates as a bidirectional regulatory system. Internal verbal processes function as top-down modulators of physiological states, while interoceptive signals provide bottom-up feedback that continuously reorganizes cognitive appraisals and affective responses. Directed embodied awareness is proposed as a means of reducing autonomic nervous system hyperactivation, establishing physiological safety, and restructuring automatic response patterns. The framework positions regulation as a trainable and measurable capacity, accessible through the structured completion of activation–recovery cycles. The proposed model integrates verbal-cognitive mechanisms within a structured body–mind regulatory process, providing theoretical grounding for applied methodologies such as the Somatic Reset Method™ (SRM) that operationalize these principles within structured, sequential regulation programs. Somatic dialogue is therefore presented as a conceptual foundation for applied, body-focused interventions addressing stress regulation and the development of adaptive self-regulation capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 9 | PDF Downloads: 3 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Chukh, Y. (2026). Somatic dialogue as a mechanism of neurophysiological regulation. Global Prosperity, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.66556/2787-9364.3-6.chukh-y
Section
Articles

References

Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological bulletin, 141(5), 931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021

Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154

Barrett, L. F., Atzil, S., Bliss-Moreau, E., Chanes, L., Gendron, M., Hoemann, K., & Westlin, C. (2025). The theory of constructed emotion: More than a feeling. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(3), 392-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251319045

Farb, N., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Gard, T., Kerr, C., Dunn, B. D., & Mehling, W. E. (2015). Interoception, contemplative practice, and health. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 763. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00763

Fermin, A. S., Friston, K., & Yamawaki, S. (2022). An insula hierarchical network architecture for active interoceptive inference. Royal Society Open Science, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220226

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological inquiry, 26(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781

Hall, K. J., Van Ooteghem, K., & McIlroy, W. E. (2023). Emotional state as a modulator of autonomic and somatic nervous system activity in postural control: a review. Frontiers in neurology, 14, 1188799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1188799

Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., Critchley, H. D., Davenport, P. W., Feinstein, J. S., & Zucker, N. (2018). Interoception and mental health: a roadmap. Biological psychiatry: cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 3(6), 501-513.

Kuhfuß, M., Maldei, T., Hetmanek, A., & Baumann, N. (2021). Somatic experiencing–effectiveness and key factors of a body-oriented trauma therapy: a scoping literature review. European journal of psychotraumatology, 12(1), 1929023. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1929023

Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978–0–19–873541–0

Porges, S. W. (2022). Polyvagal theory: A science of safety. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 16, 871227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.871227

Price, C. J., & Hooven, C. (2018). Interoceptive awareness skills for emotion regulation: Theory and approach of mindful awareness in body-oriented therapy (MABT). Frontiers in psychology, 9, 335233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00798

Racy, F., & Morin, A. (2024). Relationships between self-talk, inner speech, mind wandering, mindfulness, self-concept clarity, and self-regulation in university students. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010055

Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(11), 565-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007

Shapiro, L. A., & Spaulding, S. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition.

Tang, Y. Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature reviews neuroscience, 16(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916

Tsur, N., Berkovitz, N., & Ginzburg, K. (2016). Body awareness, emotional clarity, and authentic behavior: The moderating role of mindfulness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1451-1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9652-6

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2016). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience (revised edition). Cambridge Massachusetts. ISBN 9780262529365.