Telepharmacy in Digital Pharmaceutical Care: Economic Effects, Access, and Service Continuity

Main Article Content

Yuliya Pereguda

Abstract

Purpose. This study examines the economic effects of telepharmacy, its contribution to access, and its role in maintaining pharmaceutical services, with particular attention to Ukraine under wartime disruption. Methods. A targeted integrative literature review and thematic synthesis combined systematic reviews, economic evaluations, primary studies, institutional documents and official Ukrainian sources. Searches were updated on 16 September 2026, and evidence was interpreted by study design, evaluation perspective and reported limitations. Results. Economic findings vary by perspective. Four of six economic evaluations reviewed by De Guzman et al. reported lower costs, although provider costs could increase when pharmacist time was reimbursed. Patient savings were most evident where telephone or video care avoided travel and time costs. Clinical evidence supports selected benefits for adherence and blood pressure, but equity remains poorly measured. During disruption, pharmacists can continue counseling, medication review, monitoring and advice on medicine availability through digital communication. Ukraine already has a national e-prescription and reimbursement system, and current law requires online pharmacies to offer pharmacist consultation during medicine ordering. Conclusions. Telepharmacy can reduce selected access costs and support service continuity, but its economic value depends on staffing, reimbursement, digital inclusion and the extent to which remote contacts replace existing resource use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 0 | PDF Downloads: 0 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Pereguda, Y. (2026). Telepharmacy in Digital Pharmaceutical Care: Economic Effects, Access, and Service Continuity. Global Prosperity, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.66556/2787-9364.3-6.pereguda-y
Section
Articles

References

Aday, L. A., & Andersen, R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9(3), 208-220. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1071804/

Alfian, S. D., Insani, W. N., Puspitasari, I. M., Wawruch, M., & Abdulah, R. (2023). Effectiveness and process evaluation of using digital health technologies in pharmaceutical care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Telemedicine and e-Health, 29(9), 1289-1303. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0406

Bell-Aldeghi, R., Gibrat, B., Rapp, T., Chauvin, P., Le Guern, M., Billaudeau, N., Ould-Kaci, K., & Sevilla-Dedieu, C. (2023). Determinants of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine: Systematic screening and quantitative analysis of the literature. Telemedicine and e-Health, 29(7), 1078-1087. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0161

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2016). Resolution No. 929 of 30 November 2016: Licensing conditions for the manufacture, wholesale and retail trade, and import of medicinal products https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929-2016-%D0%BF

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2025). Resolution No. 1808 of 31 December 2025: Some issues of implementation of the Programme of Medical Guarantees in 2026 [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1808-2025-%D0%BF

Cen, Z. F., Tang, P. K., Hu, H., Cavaco, A., Zeng, L., Lei, S. L., & Ung, C. O. L. (2022). Systematic literature review of adopting eHealth in pharmaceutical care during COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations for strengthening pharmacy services. BMJ Open, 12(11), e066246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066246

Chong, R. L. K., Chan, A. S. E., Chua, C. M. S., & Lai, Y. F. (2025). Telehealth interventions in pharmacy practice: Systematic review of reviews and recommendations. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e57129. https://doi.org/10.2196/57129

Dat, T. V., Tu, V. L., Quan, N. K., Minh, N. H., Trung, T. D., Le, T. N., Phuc-Vinh, D., Trinh, D.-T. T., Dinh, L. P., Nguyen-Thi, H.-Y., & Huy, N. T. (2023). Telepharmacy: A systematic review of field application, benefits, limitations, and applicability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine and e-Health, 29(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0575

De Guzman, K. R., Gavanescu, D., Smith, A. C., & Snoswell, C. L. (2024). Economic evaluations of telepharmacy services in non-cancer settings: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 20(3), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.01.002

eHealth Network. (2024). Guideline on ePrescription and eDispensation of authorised medicinal products (Release 3.1). European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/eprescription-and-edispensation-authorised-medicinal-products-guidelines-electronic-exchange-health_en

Hareem, A., Lee, J., Stupans, I., Park, J. S., & Wang, K. (2023). Benefits and barriers associated with e-prescribing in community pharmacy - A systematic review. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 12, 100375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100375

Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., Mauskopf, J., Mullins, C. D., Petrou, S., Pwu, R.-F., & Staniszewska, S. (2022). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ, 376, e067975. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067975

International Pharmaceutical Federation. (2023). Advancements in digital pharmacy post COVID-19: Report from the FIP Technology Advisory Group. FIP. https://www.fip.org/file/5528

Khilukha, O., & Riabkov, S. (2026). The role of digital health services and telemedicine in economic development of Ukraine. Global Prosperity, 6(1). https://gprosperity.org/index.php/journal/article/view/301

Lertsinudom, S., Tiamkao, S., Mungmanitmongkol, S., & Dilokthornsakul, P. (2023). Telepharmacy services to support patients with epilepsy in Thailand: A descriptive study. Heliyon, 9(2), e13361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13361

Levesque, J.-F., Harris, M. F., & Russell, G. (2013). Patient-centred access to health care: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18

Lipych, L. H., Liutak, O. M., & Kovalska, L. L. (2026). Telemedicine as a determinant of sustainable regional economic development: Socioeconomic mechanisms and institutional conditions. Global Prosperity, 6(2). https://gprosperity.org/index.php/journal/article/view/302

Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (2026, September 8). 6.8 million patients in Ukraine have received medicines via e-prescription at least once [in Ukrainian]. https://moz.gov.ua/uk/6-8-mln-paciyentiv-v-ukrayini-hocha-b-raz-otrimali-liki-za-e-receptom

Morillo-Verdugo, R., Morillo-Lisa, R., Espolita-Suarez, J., & Delgado-Sanchez, O. (2023). Evaluation of patient experience with a model of coordinated telematic pharmaceutical care between hospital and rural pharmacies in Spain: A proof of concept. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16, 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S406636

Mozu, I. E., Marfo, A. F. A., Marfo, J. S., Adomako, N. O., Ayisi-Boateng, N. K., Boachie-Ansah, P., Attakorah, J., & Owusu-Daaku, F. T. (2023). Utilization of telepharmacy in the management of hypertension. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 12, 100381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100381

Snoswell, C. L., De Guzman, K., Neil, L. J., Isaacs, T., Mendis, R., Taylor, M. L., & Ryan, M. (2025). Synchronous telepharmacy models of care for adult outpatients: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 21(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.005

Sugita, H., Sato, M. T., Yamaji, N., Maeda, M., Ichimura, T., Sunaga, T., Toyoda, S., Nishimura, E., Tun, P. P., Augustin, G., Noma, H., Ota, E., & Hasegawa, T. (2026). Clinical effectiveness of telepharmacy services in patients with non-communicable diseases in ambulatory care settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2026(6), Article CD015136. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015136.pub2

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020). Law of Ukraine No. 904-IX of 17 September 2020, On amendments to Article 19 of the Law of Ukraine 'On Medicinal Products' regarding electronic retail trade in medicinal products [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/904-20

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). Law of Ukraine No. 2469-IX of 28 July 2022, On Medicinal Products [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2469-20

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2022). Disruption of access to medicines and medical devices in Ukraine: February-June 2022. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-6873-46639-67795

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2023). Can people afford to pay for health care? New evidence on financial protection in Ukraine 2023. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289060165

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2025). Health needs assessment of the adult population in Ukraine: Survey report: April 2025. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/ukraine/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2025-6904-46670-80597

World Health Organization. (2023). Access to NCD medicines: Emergent issues during the COVID-19 pandemic and key structural factors. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240069442

World Health Organization. (2025). Global strategy on digital health 2020-2027. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116870