SUPERVISION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF ENTERPRISES WHICH OPERATE DUAL-USE GOODS (TECHNOLOGIES): CURRENT STATE AND CHALLENGES DYNAMICS

Main Article Content

Iryna Mazur
Yuliia Zhelizko

Abstract

In this article, we revealed the dynamics of change of supervision over the development, production, export and use of dual-use goods (technologies) from the end of the XIX century to the beginning of the XXI century. We proved that during the whole period of the research, there was a strengthening of supervision in the field of solid waste, especially concerning enterprises that develop, manufacture, export and use dual-use goods (technologies). The reasons for this are changing trends in security and the economy. We identified modern problems of strengthening supervision over the development, production, export and use of weapons and dual-use goods (technologies). Furthermore, we identified four areas of problem formation: at the supranational level, at the national level, at the level of individual business entities, the introduction of new ways to strengthen supervision. Ukraine's problems in this area are revealed separately, based on a study of the development of its supervision system over the development, production, export and use of weapons and dual-use goods (technologies).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 80 | PDF Downloads: 54 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Mazur, I. ., & Zhelizko, Y. . (2021). SUPERVISION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF ENTERPRISES WHICH OPERATE DUAL-USE GOODS (TECHNOLOGIES): CURRENT STATE AND CHALLENGES DYNAMICS. Global Prosperity, 1(3), 34–42. Retrieved from https://gprosperity.org/index.php/journal/article/view/26
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Iryna Mazur, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Iryna Mazur, Department of Environmental Management and Entrepreneurship, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Volodymyrska st., 60, 01033 Kyiv, Ukraine, iimazur@ukr.net , ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-8001

Yuliia Zhelizko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Yuliia Zhelizko, Faculty of Economics, Department of environmental management and entrepreneurship, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Volodymyrska st., 60, 01033 Kyiv, Ukraine, bodikova03061@ukr.net, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-1166

References

Alavi., H., Khamichonak T. A. (2016). European dilemma: the EU export control regime on dual-use goods and technologies. Law and Economics Review, 7 (3), 161–172.

Dinu V., Lazar C., Chihai I.-S. (2017). Features on sale in dual-use items. International Conference knowledge-based organization, XXIII, 2, 41-45.

Baptista M. (2013). Dual use intelectual property & technology transfers under the scope of export controls. Trabalho final de mestrado. Março.

Handbook on Georgia's Export Control System to Raise Awareness of CBRN related Dual Use Items Export Controls, Revenue Service of the Ministry of Finance of Georgia.

Jurgaitis R. (2019). Controlling dual-use goods in a transit country: Lithuania’s experience, https://mag.wcoomd.org/magazine/wco-news-90/controlling-dual-use-goods-lithuania

Bauer S., Bromley M. (2016). The dual-use export control policy review: balancing security, trade and academic freedom in a changing world. EU NoN-ProliferatioN CoNsortiUm, 48.

Fiott D., Prizeman K. (2013). The Arms Trade Treaty and the Control of Dual-Use Goods and Technologies. What Can the European Union’s Export Control Regime Offer? IES Working paper, 1.

Charatsis C. (2017). Dual-use Research and Trade Controls: Opportunities and Controversies. Strategic trade review. 3, 4, 47–68.

Hood A. & Tauwhare R. (2020). Recast of the EU Dual-Use Regulation.. URL: https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/insights/recast-of-the-eu-dual-use-regulation.

Johansson M. (2017). Strategic Export Controls in 2017 – Military Equipment and Dual-Use Items. Government Communication, 18, 114.